A guide to limiting reactant problems... using sandwiches

academics chemistry
By Viemma

An everyday limiting reactant problem

You’re expecting company and totally forgot to go grocery shopping. What on earth will you feed your guests? Sandwiches! You have some ingredients to whip up some sandwiches. So, let’s assume you are going to go through with making these sandwiches. You need 2 slices of bread, 3 slices of meat (can’t be stingy), and 1 slice of cheese for each sandwich. After raiding your refrigerator, you discover that you have 8 slices of bread, 9 slices of meat, and 5 slices of cheese. You worry that this won’t be enough. How many sandwiches can you make?

Oh, this is easy. 8 slices of bread, 2 slices per sandwich – 4 sandwiches! But wait. 9 slices of meat, 3 slices per sandwich – that would only make 3 sandwiches. But wait. 5 slices of cheese, 1 slice per sandwich – that would 5 sandwiches! Well once the slices of meat run out after sandwich number 3, you won’t be able to make any more sandwiches. And no, you’re not interested in making grilled cheeses. So, you can only make 3 sandwiches. The meat determined how many sandwiches you could make in completion. It made the least number of sandwiches. Thus, the meat is the limiting reactant!

image 1

Here's the math:

  • Bread: 8 x (1 sandwich ÷ 2 slices) = 4 sandwiches
  • Meat: 9 x (1 sandwich ÷ 3 slices) = 3 sandwiches
  • Cheese: 5 x (1 sandwich ÷ 1 slice) = 5 sandwiches

What is a limiting reactant and why do they exist?

A limiting reactant (or limiting reagent) is a reactant that is entirely consumed when the reaction goes to completion. It ultimately determines how much product can be obtained. The excess reactant (or excess reactant) is the reactant that is not entirely consumed when the reaction goes to completion. Some of it will remain after the reaction is complete. In the scenario above, 3 sandwiches were made at completion of the sandwich-making process. No meat was leftover, making meat the limiting reactant. 2 slices of bread and 2 slices of cheese were leftover, making bread and cheese excess reactants.

In the scenario above, it was a matter of chance that there were reactants in excess. I’m sure if you could have it your way, you’d have acquired the correct number of each sandwich component so that there would be no leftovers. In chemistry, excess reactants are deliberate.

What sense does this make? You wouldn’t be able to make any more product than what the limiting reactant has determined. So why not just provide the “equal” amounts of all the reactants so that none is wasted? Especially if you know just how much product you want to make? Well, chemists hardly ever carry out reactions with “equal”, or stoichiometric, amounts of reactants. One is always in excess because the more reactant added, the faster the reaction will occur. Principles of kinetics in its purest form, beyond the scope of this post. Chemists want to get their products as quickly as possible and an excess reactant accomplishes this.

The approach to limiting reactant problems

These problems are going to provide you with starting amounts of reactants and ask you how much product can be made from them. Just like the sandwich dilemma. But one thing is missing that is crucial. Just like we were told how much of each sandwich component were found in one sandwich – the sandwich formula, we need to be told how much of each reactant will be found in a certain amount of product. This is where balanced chemical equations come in.

Consider the following balanced chemical equation:

2A + 4B --> 3C 

The coefficients show:

  • Relative numbers of molecules of reactants and products.
  • Relative number of moles of reactants and products, which can be converted to mass.

Moles are your best friend and should always be used to interpret balanced chemical equations because they are easier to work with since molecules are too small and because they can be converted easily to mass which is how most express “how much”.

An interpretation of the balanced chemical equation above would be: to make 3 moles of C, you need 2 moles of A and 4 moles of B. If you wanted to know how to make 1 mole of C, divide the whole equation by 3. To make 1 mole of C, you need 2/3 moles of A and 4/3 moles of B. This is obviously a mouth full and hence why we use whole numbers to balance equations. 

Now, we have all the information we need to determine how much product made.

  1. Determine the limiting reactant by considering each reactant as independent and determining how many MOLES of product would be made from its starting amount. Just like you did for your sandwiches, do this for all the reactants.

    If the starting amount of reactant is provided in grams, use dimensional analysis and follow the schematic below:
    Picture 3-1

    *Substance A is the reactant and substance B is the product of interest*

    If the starting amount of reactant is provided in moles, it’s much simpler:

    image 4

  2. Whichever reactant created the smallest number of product in moles is your limiting reactant. You’ll run out of it first and won’t be able to make any more product.

  3. Check the question to see how they want you to express the “how much” of product.

    If they want in moles, you’ve already found it. It’s nothing more than the smallest of the moles of product you calculated from the independent reactants.

    If they want in grams, convert those moles to grams:

image 5

Putting these steps into practice

Zinc metal reacts with hydrochloric acid by the following reaction:

image 7

If 0.30 mol Zn is added to hydrochloric acid solution containing 0.52 mol HCl, how many moles of H2 are produced?


  1. image 8

  2. HCl made the smallest number of H2 in moles and is thus the limiting reactant.
  3. The amount of H2 produced must be 0.26 mol.

Comments

topicTopics
academics study skills MCAT medical school admissions SAT expository writing college admissions English MD/PhD admissions strategy writing LSAT GMAT GRE physics chemistry math biology graduate admissions academic advice ACT interview prep law school admissions test anxiety language learning premed MBA admissions career advice personal statements homework help AP exams creative writing MD study schedules test prep computer science Common Application summer activities history mathematics philosophy organic chemistry secondary applications economics supplements research 1L PSAT admissions coaching grammar law psychology statistics & probability legal studies ESL CARS SSAT covid-19 dental admissions logic games reading comprehension engineering USMLE calculus PhD admissions Spanish mentorship parents Latin biochemistry case coaching verbal reasoning DAT English literature STEM excel medical school political science skills AMCAS French Linguistics MBA coursework Tutoring Approaches academic integrity chinese letters of recommendation Anki DO Social Advocacy admissions advice algebra art history artificial intelligence astrophysics business cell biology classics diversity statement gap year genetics geometry kinematics linear algebra mechanical engineering mental health presentations quantitative reasoning study abroad technical interviews time management work and activities 2L DMD IB exams ISEE MD/PhD programs Sentence Correction adjusting to college algorithms amino acids analysis essay athletics business skills careers cold emails data science dental school finance first generation student functions graphing information sessions international students internships logic networking poetry resume revising science social sciences software engineering tech industry trigonometry writer's block 3L AAMC Academic Interest EMT FlexMed Fourier Series Greek Health Professional Shortage Area Italian Lagrange multipliers London MD vs PhD MMI Montessori National Health Service Corps Pythagorean Theorem Python Shakespeare Step 2 TMDSAS Taylor Series Truss Analysis Zoom acids and bases active learning architecture argumentative writing art art and design schools art portfolios bacteriology bibliographies biomedicine brain teaser campus visits cantonese capacitors capital markets central limit theorem centrifugal force chemical engineering chess chromatography class participation climate change clinical experience community service constitutional law consulting cover letters curriculum dementia demonstrated interest dimensional analysis distance learning econometrics electric engineering electricity and magnetism escape velocity evolution executive function freewriting genomics harmonics health policy history of medicine history of science hybrid vehicles hydrophobic effect ideal gas law immunology induction infinite institutional actions integrated reasoning intermolecular forces intern investing investment banking lab reports linear maps mandarin chinese matrices mba medical physics meiosis microeconomics mitosis mnemonics music music theory nervous system neurology neuroscience object-oriented programming office hours operating systems

Related Content