The GMAT is the key to business school admissions, and the top business schools rely on the Case Study Method of learning. So why shouldn't the Case Study Method be the key to the GMAT?

On the first day of a spring semester Business School Finance class, the Professor took the time to explain why he loves using the case method to teach the important principles from the course.  “I could just walk you through a bunch of theories,” he said, “But then you’d be stuck with some abstract knowledge that you’d mostly forget the minute you walked out of the class.”  He went on to say that by using cases, we can approach the issues in a more hands-on way.  The theory can then undergird those key case takeaways.

Right away, I thought about my experience with GMAT coaching.  Much like the Professor who is emphatic about using cases to illustrate the major points, I believe strongly in using actual test problems to build the bedrock of knowledge and experience needed for success on the test.  From now on, in fact, I’ll explain to students that each GMAT problem should be seen as a “mini-case” with its own valuable lessons and takeaways.  Much like an MBA student analyzing the meaning of a case, a GMAT student should never view a problem in isolation.  The point is never to merely learn how to work through a particular example, but to see how that process can be replicated across other questions and question types.

For instance, take a Data Sufficiency Problem like this:

During a 10-day period, the average (arithmetic mean) high temperature was 65 degrees Fahrenheit.  What was the high temperature on the 10th day?

(1)   The average high temperature for the first nine days was 64 degrees Fahrenheit.

(2)   The high temperature on the last day increased the average temperature for the period by 1 degree Fahrenheit.

A GMAT student in New York recently e-mailed me to ask about this question.  I wrote back to say that I’m even more interested in the process associated with this question than I am with the answer (D).  As I always tell my GMAT students, every time you see the words ‘arithmetic mean’ anywhere on the test, you should instantly know that you will need to find a total value.  That process needs to be automatic, in order to save time spent solving the problem AND to save time that would have been spent figuring out HOW to solve the problem.

Students applying this principle see the set-up and quickly write “650 total degrees” on their scratch pad.  When they evaluate statement 1, they write, “576 total degrees, days 1-9.”  At this point, they don’t even need to solve for the missing temperature (74), because they know they have enough.  Now, the answer must either be (A) or (D).

With statement two, they know the total number was 650, and they know that the period prior to the last day was nine days long, with an average high of 64 (since the overall average high was one degree greater than the average for this period).  Remembering that ‘arithmetic mean’ is always a code for ‘go find the total,’ they write 64x9 = 576.  Again, the difference between those two numbers is the high temperature for the 10th day, so there’s enough info here.  The answer must be D.

Since GMAC loves to write questions that involve arithmetic means with important values missing, the lesson demonstrated by this “mini-case” has widespread applicability across the test.  And the best way to identify those lessons – and to make them stick – is to start by tackling problems head-on.  Over time, a student will see many more problems of the same nature – always with a different set-up and different numbers.  As a GMAT student sees an increasingly large number of ways that information can be presented and tested, she will reinforce the major concepts that she has learned, starting with the first time she saw it applied.

The Professor went on to offer a few more thoughts about the learning process:

• “See it six different ways to truly understand it.”  I have no idea how he came up with the number six, but bear in mind, the guy has been teaching Finance for 35 years.  This has great GMAT applicability, as a student going through the entire OG will certainly see six or more different approaches to the various question types.
• “Don’t worry, I’m just shelling the beaches here.”  When a new concept is introduced, don’t worry if it doesn’t make sense right away. Let as much of it sink in as you can.  The rest may just take time.  Much like a military shelling an enemy’s beaches prior to a land invasion, a Professor may just be readying students for a more concentrated, coordinated assault by initially introducing a concept or idea.  This applies well for a student seeing combinatorics for the first time – just press the “I believe” button and go with what your GMAT tutor says – everything will sink in eventually.
• “The magic of pen-to-paper-to-brain.”  This Professor loves to have students take copious notes, because he’s convinced that the process of writing information down aids greatly with the retention process.  As a GMAT tutor, I feel the same way – from observation, I know that students who just flip through tons of pages of material and say, “Yeah, I got it” will retain very little of that information.  Students who go through the pain of writing questions out in order to be sure that they’ve actually “got it” tend to perform far better on the test.

If you’re still having trouble, why not consider reaching out to Cambridge Coaching?  We have expert GMAT tutors available in New York, Boston, and online.

Tags: GMAT