The single most useful tactic I learned for standardized test prep

High School LSAT SAT test prep

Standardized test prep can be a grueling process for the mind, body, and spirit. It took a great degree of willpower not to hurl myself into the sun whenever my practice scores began to dip again (and again, and again). But as frustrating as they might be, disappointing practice days are undoubtedly the best days to improve. 

Reviewing your practice exams is just as important as taking the exam itself, if not more so. Most of the applicants I’ve worked with understand this. However, many of them followed a similar pattern of scoring their exams, reading through the explanations for their incorrect answers, and then calling it a day or turning to the next exam. While this approach is certainly helpful, it is a passive and therefore less efficient way to learn from one’s mistakes. 

Whenever possible, try to turn your review into an active process that engages your brain and further flexes your test-taking muscles. I learned this early on from a mentor of mine, who taught me a study strategy that I relied on for the SAT, the LSAT, and even the Uniform Bar Exam: the wrong answer log.

Keeping a wrong answer log

For each practice exam that you take, record the questions that you got wrong. If you are feeling particularly zealous, you can record the full question prompt as well as each answer choice for easier accessibility. I think Excel is the easiest medium to do this, but a Word document (or even a pen and paper) works just as well.

By keeping a comprehensive log of all of the questions that you answered incorrectly, you slowly build up a repository of lessons and challenging questions that you can review later on. This is a very helpful way to familiarize yourself with your growth areas. But even if you never refer back to a particular question, the act of recording that question is helpful in and of itself to imprint the lesson into your mind. 

Write your own, personalized answer-explanation 

For each question that you answered incorrectly, you want to write down the following:

  1. Why the correct answer is correct
  2. Why the answer you chose is incorrect & why you chose that answer
  3. Why the other two answers are incorrect


By writing down why the correct answer is correct, you are actively engaging with the logic or lesson that the exam writer had in mind. This is what one does when one reads through the official question explanations. However, most test-takers neglect the other three answer choices. By also writing down why your answer was incorrect—and why that answer tempted you in the first place—you can shine a light on the personal habits or patterns that led you to make that mistake.

Understanding why an incorrect answer is incorrect is just as important as understanding why the correct answer is correct. Because exam writers are tasked with writing four equally plausible answer choices, each wrong answer contains four valuable lessons that one can learn from in their review. While some wrong answers may be obvious or self-evident to you, it is still a useful practice to articulate your implicit thought processes. For some tests, like the LSAT, there is a sea of online resources where people have written their own answer explanations for every question of every test since the dawn of time. Use them—especially when you feel confused or frustrated with the one in front of you. 

Make note of global takeaways or goals for yourself 

After your careful review, take the opportunity to jot down some global notes and takeaways for yourself. Which sections do you struggle with and what type of questions should make you more cautious? What is a mistake that you keep making? What is a method that you want to try in your next exam to fix the issue you had today? Doing this helps give you direction for your next practice exam. 

This process is time-consuming, but the extra time you put into reviewing your exams is worth it. The sooner you can identify your own habits and gaps of knowledge, the more time you’ll have to address them. Good luck!

Screen Shot 2023-09-15 at 12.23.17 PM


Patrick is a recent JD graduate from Yale Law School. He previously received his BA in Economics from the University of Chicago and now works as a Trial Attorney at the Public Defender Service for the District of Columbia.


academics study skills MCAT medical school admissions SAT expository writing college admissions English MD/PhD admissions writing LSAT strategy GMAT GRE physics chemistry math biology graduate admissions ACT academic advice interview prep law school admissions test anxiety language learning MBA admissions premed career advice personal statements homework help AP exams creative writing MD study schedules Common Application test prep summer activities computer science history philosophy organic chemistry secondary applications economics mathematics supplements PSAT admissions coaching grammar research 1L law statistics & probability psychology ESL legal studies CARS SSAT covid-19 dental admissions logic games reading comprehension engineering USMLE Spanish calculus mentorship parents Latin case coaching verbal reasoning DAT PhD admissions excel political science AMCAS English literature French Linguistics MBA coursework Tutoring Approaches academic integrity chinese medical school Anki DO STEM Social Advocacy admissions advice algebra astrophysics biochemistry business classics diversity statement genetics geometry kinematics letters of recommendation mechanical engineering mental health presentations quantitative reasoning skills study abroad technical interviews time management work and activities 2L IB exams ISEE MD/PhD programs adjusting to college algorithms art history artificial intelligence athletics business skills careers cold emails data science first generation student functions gap year international students internships linear algebra logic poetry resume revising science social sciences software engineering tech industry trigonometry 3L AAMC Academic Interest DMD EMT FlexMed Fourier Series Greek Health Professional Shortage Area Italian Lagrange multipliers London MD vs PhD MMI Montessori National Health Service Corps Pythagorean Theorem Python Sentence Correction Shakespeare Step 2 TMDSAS Taylor Series Truss Analysis Zoom acids and bases amino acids analysis essay architecture argumentative writing art art and design schools art portfolios bibliographies biomedicine brain teaser campus visits cantonese capacitors capital markets cell biology central limit theorem centrifugal force chemical engineering chess chromatography class participation climate change clinical experience community service constitutional law consulting cover letters curriculum dementia demonstrated interest dental school dimensional analysis distance learning econometrics electric engineering electricity and magnetism enrichment escape velocity european history evolution executive function finance freewriting fun facts genomics graphing harmonics health policy history of medicine history of science hybrid vehicles hydrophobic effect ideal gas law induction infinite information sessions institutional actions integrated reasoning intermolecular forces intern investing investment banking lab reports linear maps mandarin chinese matrices mba medical physics meiosis microeconomics mitosis music music theory networking neurology neuroscience object-oriented programming office hours operating systems organization outlining pedagogy